Obama's radical Socialist and Marxist connections and convictions unfold

Barack Obama is a radical Socialist one of whose goals is to engineer election success through a form of class warfare. Consistently he has attacked the higher earners-the top 15% of voters.
He speaks about redistribution. He forgets that such attacks will force capital outflows to safer havens. Obama is by conviction a crypto Marxist. Certainly the candidate of change. The candidate of the radical left.

Just look at the following from American Thinker and then read the full article:
"Another piece in the puzzle of Barack Obama has been revealed, greatly strengthening the picture of a man groomed by an older generation of radical leftists for insertion into the American political process, trading on good looks, brains, educational pedigree, and the desire of the vast majority of the voting public to right the historical racial wrongs of the land.
The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of "fusion" failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling.
But dissolving the party didn't stop the membership,
INCLUDING Barack Obama, from continuing to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success. "............................................
Now continue reading here

Three Big Reasons To Elect John McCain

David Kupelian in an article in WorldNetDaily outlines three compelling reasons to elect John McCain as President. The following are brief excerpts from an article which contains a penetrating analysis of both candidates stances on key issues. These should whet the appetite for a more intensive analysis of the full article.

End the tyranny of the Supreme Court

".......If elected president, McCain will appoint conservatives like Roberts and Alito. He has vowed to do precisely this, publicly and repeatedly, and there's no reason to think someone with such a steadfastly pro-life Senate voting record as his would do otherwise. Obama, on the other hand, has made it clear he will appoint justices dedicated to preventing Roe v. Wade from being overturned any time in our lifetimes........."

Win the war against radical Islam

.".....McCain understands that losing in Iraq is unthinkable – betraying all the coalition forces and Iraqis who have fought and died there, turbo-charging Islamic fanaticism the world over, transforming Iraq into a mecca for terrorists and further radicalizing the entire Middle East. He knows the military inside and out, and has what it takes to be a wartime commander in chief.
Obama, on the other hand, is a weak and inexperienced leader and would undo all that has been accomplished at such great cost in blood and treasure. Like other liberal elitists with giant egos (Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton), Obama believes that somehow his superior intelligence, judgment and niceness will win the day, whether by meeting with terrorist leaders like Iran's Ahmadinejad, or in undermining the Iraq war effort....."

A President needs strong character

"Although Ann Coulter describes Obama as having "accomplished absolutely nothing in his entire life except to give speeches about 'change,'" he's not just a young, empty slate with a dazzling exterior. All his adult life Obama has associated with radicals, criminals, communists and terrorists. If you think I'm exaggerating, you haven't been paying attention – no thanks to the establishment press, which is doing its best to conceal the truth about Obama. In every area – from abortion....................."

Abortion-Hillary Clinton tries to have her cake and eat it

Hillary Clinton is "Seeking Shared Ground Over Abortions," according to the front page of the New York Times. "Hillary in the middle on values issues," announces the Washington Times.
So Hillary Clinton is in the middle on value issues and is seeking shared ground on the abortion issue is she?
Hillary has spoken clearly about the necessity to respect such landmark Supreme Court decisions as Roe v. Wade. There is no middle ground on the abortion issue. You either respect the right to life of the unborn child -in the mothers womb- or not. Clinton has embarked on a complex strategy founded on a formula of words to somehow convey the impression that that she is not at all in favour of abortion.
Clinton scores 100% by NARAL on her pro-abortion voting record . That is the real Hillary Clinton . Clinton is endorsed by EMILY's list, a pro-abortion political action committee:
EMILY’s List operates as a donor network and recommends pro-abortion Democratic women candidates to its members. She Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming unborn foetus during other crime. In April 2007 Clinton criticised the Supreme Court's Gonzales v. Carhart ruling that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act. She would nominate pro-abortion judges to the Supreme Court.
She has said "I have met thousands and thousands of pro-choice men and women. I have never met anyone who is pro-abortion" Nonsense. If you are pro choice you support the provision of facilities to abort the unborn. There is no "common ground on this issue". There is no middle way.
Hillary Clinton is the master of subterfuge on the abortion issue.